Course syllabus

Lecture 4



Today we had an exciting lecture about mating systems and parental care. Our debate about the traditional polygyny threshold theorem (Orians 1969) and the sex son adaptation (Weatherhead and Robertson 1979) was wonderful. You were much more engaged in your discussions, you exchanged ideas more freely, worked as a team, problem solved, and then communicated your thoughts effectively. This technique forced a deeper understanding of the material. Please remember this level of engagement, for each time you read a new paper. I'm eager to hear your thoughts on the debate-style discussion when you fill in your daily feedback.

Mating systems
What conditions and characteristics determine the mating systems used by animals. How do males and females monopolize resources in the environment to obtain more mates, and ultimately, higher reproductive success?





Parental care
Why do parents provide care for their young after producing gametes? Among those species where parental care is beneficial, how is that care negotiated among both parents. What prevents one sex from abandoning their responsibilities, and when is it appropriate for care to be coordinated between the sexes? These differences can result in conflict, that at times can be reconciled.

1 comment:

  1. Sometimes scientific ideas are formally challenged. When this happens one group (or individual) will write a critique of a particular article. Then, the authors of the original article are given the opportunity to rebut those criticisms. This is just what happened with Weatherhead and Robertson's (1979) "sexy son" hypothesis. By 1981 Searcy and Yasukawa challenged the idea, and Weatherhead and Robertson responded. I think you may find the scientific exchange useful and informative after our debate. Please find the original papers below. Enjoy reading!

    Links to References:
    (Weatherhead and Robertson 1979)
    (Searcy and Yasukawa 1981)
    (Weatherhead and Robertson 1981)

    ReplyDelete